An $11 million loan. Source — George Soros. For some, his name evokes images of liberal philanthropy. But a closer look reveals that Soros is at the center of countless global controversies. So when he funnels money into Grameen Telecom, questions naturally arise—about the source, intent, and implications of that funding.
According to Grameen Telecom, they raised investment funds for Grameenphone from three sources: George Soros’ foundation, various commercial banks, and a so-called “ownerless company” called Grameen Kalyan. Anyone with common sense would pause at this. How can an “ownerless company” disburse multi-million-dollar loans? Who controls such a company? Who holds the responsibility? On top of that, these entities are so deeply intertwined that even through the lens of transparency, all one can see is a fog of confusion.
Grameenphone is Bangladesh’s largest telecom operator. In such a high-stakes financial environment, where millions of dollars are exchanged, are we to believe that this happened just because one man said: “I requested Soros”? Doesn’t that sound more like a bedtime story for children?
If Soros truly gave the loan, then what was the interest on that $11 million? What were the conditions? What was the loan guarantee? Has the Bangladeshi public seen any documentation of this transaction? Has any proof been publicly presented? No. Apparently, none of that matters, because “Yunus said so.”
Another oddity—this supposed loan was repaid “on time.” What does “on time” mean? Who determined the deadline? Who verified the transactions? Is this the kind of democratic transparency that wins them accolades around the world?
Who is George Soros?
He is a front-line operator behind Western interventionist politics. A financial terrorist working to keep the world under Zionist dominance, someone who collapses entire national currencies when convenient, buys out media outlets to control narratives, and builds shadow states within sovereign countries—all while wearing the mask of “liberalism.” His money fuels protests, destabilizes elections, and topples governments. Simply put, once Soros touches a country, it no longer belongs to itself.
And now Bangladesh seems to be part of that same script—with Yunus moving the pieces, using the Grameen model as a cover. But what is this Grameen model, really? A kind of “decorated loan circus,” where the profits are swallowed by Yunus and his foreign patrons, while the poor borrowers remain trapped in debt and despair.
So, when someone forges such a personal relationship with a global figure like Soros and channels his money to strengthen a private company in Bangladesh—can we still call it a mere financial transaction? Or is it something more?
Muhammad Yunus is a Nobel laureate—that title has long silenced many questions. But a Nobel Prize does not provide immunity from accountability. The time has come to look beyond the gloss of past glories and confront the facts. Where there is no trace of billions of taka, where transparency is absent, asking questions becomes a civic duty.
And the biggest question of all—do the people of this country know who has had, or still has, control over their communication infrastructure? Do they understand how invisible global actors gain a foothold here? If not, then Grameenphone’s “disconnection” isn’t just about telecom signals—it may be a sign that we are losing control of the nation itself.
